Women-owned production and media companies play a crucial role in shaping a more diverse,...
Welcome to 2026's streaming landscape. Netflix, the company that started it all, is now playing monopoly with Warner Bros. Discovery's content library.1 Disney spent $9 billion to fully own Hulu after years of sharing custody with Comcast.2
The "streaming wars” is a period beginning in 2018 when major media companies began competing with their streaming platforms in a race for subscribers. Now they all consolidate into cable 2.0, except this time, we're paying more and getting fewer options.
Between 2019 and 2026, the streaming industry went from explosive growth to a brutal consolidation. The companies that promised to liberate us from cable bundles are now creating their own bundles. Think the Disney+/Hulu/ESPN+ package, or the Max and Disney+ cross platform deal. The very competitors that used to fight for your subscription dollars are now sharing it. Once competing for the best shows, platforms continue to pursue consolidation, buying out rivals and continuing to scale in an overcrowded market. Netflix, the one company everyone was betting would lose, is not only still standing, but posting record profits while its competitors scramble to stop the bleeding.
The streaming wars is an ongoing battle between media giants for subscribers and market dominance, more often than not resulting in a merger further down the line. And the question now isn't who is winning, but what this consolidation means for the content we watch and the prices we'll pay. There's a moment in every gold rush where the real money stops being in the discovery. It shifts to whoever owns the land they're digging on. That's where we are with streaming right now.
This is the story of how an industry built on disruption disrupted itself. This blog will cover the evolution of the streaming industry: how today’s major platforms have grown, merged, and reshaped the market.
Table of Contents
3. When Growth Stopped Being Enough
5. All Paths Lead to Collision
5. Conclusion
Before The Gold Rush
Before the modern age of streaming, video on the internet existed mostly in the form of Youtube, Vimeo, and Twitch (known then as Justin.tv).
It was only through innovation and luck that Netflix launched in 2007 to moderate success. In the same year, Hulu released their own streaming platform. Even while other competitors like Hulu saw the opportunity, Netflix doubled down on it. They poured their own money and took on massive debt to fund original content. Orange is a New Black and House of Cards being some of the first, and releasing new seasons of hit shows, Netflix carved a groove into a niche that no one knew existed.
Traditional networks that had built decades and decades of content on cable found themselves in an awkward position: join the ranks of Netflix and offer streaming on demand at a price that made no sense or watch as their viewers leave in droves to the internet.
Everyone Gets a Shovel
November 2019 marked the real beginning of the wars when Disney+ went live on November 12th alongside Apple TV+’s debut November 1st. Both companies bet billions that consumers would add yet another subscription to their monthly bills. Disney+ was particularly bullish, banking on its trove of Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, and Disney animation to pull subscribers from Netflix’s orbit.
Then came 2020. Peacock launched in April with a strategy nobody else has tried: a free, ad-supported tier that cost viewers nothing. NBCUniversal’s logic was sound, lure people in for free, hook them on “The Office” reruns and live sports, then upsell to the premium tiers. It bundled automatically with Comcast's 20 million cable subscribers, instantly giving it a sizable audience from the start.
HBO Max followed in May 2020, bringing prestige and quality content from their original programming and Warner Bros.’ entire film library. AT&T positioned it as the quality over quantity alternative, fewer shows than Netflix but every one of them being premium.
Then the pandemic hit, accelerating timelines nobody had anticipated. Traditional TV production shut down, live sports paused, and movie theaters went dark. What had once been a competitive industry was suddenly a captive one, and consumers had no choice but to begin watching their favorite shows and movies online.
With movie theater’s closed and everyone stuck at home, streaming became the only option, the only game in town.
Subscriber numbers exploded across every platform, Netflix alone added more than 26 million global subscribers in the first half of 2020, beating its own internal forecasts.3
The timing could not have been better for the new entrants and worse for traditional media companies and networks still clinging to the theatrical releases and cable bundles.
The streaming wars had officially begun, and at the time, everyone was eating well. Media giants such as Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, HBO Max, and Peacock were producing original content to grow their subscriber bases, traditional cable networks continued appealing to their loyal viewers, and audiences enjoyed a wide variety of shows and movies.
When Growth Stopped Being Enough
At Disney’s investor day in December 2020, Disney+ was projected to have 260 million global subscribers by 2024, a very ambitious target compared to Peacock’s forecast of 30-35 million or HBO’s more modest goal of 50 Million domestic subscribers by 2025.
Everyone had their sights set on one thing: get viewers to subscribe for as long as possible. The battlefield was real.
Around 75 million U.S. households were still subscribed to cable bundles in 2020, with analysts expecting that number to drop to 50 million within five years. That gap, 25 million households worth of people actively looking for something else, was the prize everyone was chasing.
Interestingly enough, viewers weren’t loyal, but instead hopped from one service to another depending on the trends in the moment. By October 2020, a Deloitte Study4 found that 25% of subscribers had already canceled one service to sign up for another. This was up 17% from five months previously. Binge the show, cancel, move on. By continuously adding and removing certain shows and movies, streaming services created an environment where consumers would simply chase content instead of subscribing permanently.
Subscriber growth eventually began to level off while production costs kept rising. Suddenly, the original strategy was no longer bringing in guaranteed profits. The question had now shifted from how many subscribers can you get to how much money can we make from this. The transition from a growth-first, low-cost strategy to focus on profitability was expected, as most companies knew that this model was not sustainable. Attracting users with cheap pricing, building a larger audience, and generating profit was always the main goal, but many people did not expect the shift to happen so quickly.
The early excitement behind “Peak TV” began to fade. Studios discovered it was smarter to chase sustainability instead of pure subscriber volume. The total number of scripted series dropped by 24% in 2023 compared to the year before. Fewer shows and movies entered production and greenlights became even bigger of a financial problem.
Streaming had entered a new phase.
Ads, Ads, and more Ads
They introduced a model that many once tried to avoid; advertising.
Ad-supported plans quickly gained popularity, and by 2025 it made up 46% of all premium streaming subscriptions in the United States. In addition, they drove 71% of new subscriber growth over the previous nine quarters.
Most people were not interested in paying full prices for multiple platforms at once.
Lower-priced, ad-supported tiers appealed to price sensitive customers, and companies could still earn their revenue through advertising. Once international, this model became even more impactful. In high-growth regions across Asia, these lower-priced ad tiers allowed platforms to continue showcasing the ever growing number of new subscribers.
At the same time ad-supported tiers were introduced; bundles also began to arise. Instead of competing for individual subscriptions, some platforms found that the best way to move forward was to partner with their rivals. We saw bundles like Disney+ and (HBO) Max promoting their series at a lower combined price.
Bundles discouraged viewers who had developed a habit of subscribing to platforms for a singular show and cancelling once they were done binging. The value felt higher, and viewers stayed longer. Retention increased, giving companies more stable revenue.
Even after this revision, bundling did not fix their core issue: the economics of streaming was still incredibly difficult. Production costs still continued to skyrocket, and many companies lost billions trying to keep their platforms afloat. Even Disney itself lost $4 billion in its direct-to-consumer division in a singular year. Paramount Global reported that they too had multibillion dollar losses.
Platforms with larger subscriber bases planned to spread production costs across many users. Something like this was simple for a company as large as Netflix with its 250 million global subscriber bases, and it became clear that size was the ultimate advantage. Growth alone was no longer enough, and companies began to focus on efficient growth.
All Paths Lead to Consolidation
As pressures to adapt increased, companies began consolidating ownership. In June of 2025, Disney secured full ownership of Hulu, valuing the company at approximately $27.5 billion.
This full ownership came with several advantages. Subscriber data became unified. Advertising was streamlined. And companies were now able to control strategy using outside partners, and soon other companies followed suit.
As pressures to adapt increased, companies also began pursuing major restructuring deals to remain competitive. One of the most notable examples was when Skydance Media made a move to acquire Paramount Global, causing a significant shift in the way studios would operate. This consolidation trend streamlines operations and made way for stronger strategic control in the industry. For paramount, this partnership offered an opportunity to modernize its approach, while also giving SkyDance a larger foothold in large-scale distribution.
Along with fewer greenlights, big changes appeared in the type and number of shows produced. Scripted original series in the United States dropped by 24% in 2023 alone. Companies became much more selective. Franchises were now the focus, and established brands felt much safer.
Several platforms simply could not keep up with the competition. Several platforms could not keep up. Quibi shut down after a quick six months. CNN+ lasted only three weeks after AT&T pulled the plug, and platforms like Peacock continue to lose millions of dollars each quarter.
Further consolidation has proven to be necessary for survival, and an even more significant development between Warner Bros. Discovery and SkyDance media has further restructured the media landscape. This newer deal reflects the growing need for scale and financial stability in the even more increasingly competitive streaming environment. With the companies combining their resources, they aimed to reduce costs and better position themselves against other dominating streaming platforms.
Conclusion
Streaming, as it existed in the early days, was never sustainable. The other companies who tried to copy Netflix's success either found themselves bought out by a larger company—who's main source of income is not streaming—or deeply underwater.
Streaming was supposed to be the escape from cable: cheaper, more convenient, and with no ads. With bundling, paywalls, and ads, we're back where we started. The companies that survived aren't the ones who made the best shows. They're the ones who owned the most land. Netflix, Disney, Amazon, and Paramount/Skydance are still standing—as of early 2026—by having deep pockets or who make their money outside of streaming.
Even though the gold rush in streaming is over, is there more opportunity elsewhere? YouTube and TikTok are capturing the younger generation who never got to experience cable at its peak. Is there another gold mine around the corner? Find out in our next installment.
